Reentrance lockout is a situation similar todeadlockandnested monitor lockout. Reentrance lockout is also covered in part in the texts onLocksandRead / Write Locks.

Reentrance lockout may occur if a thread reenters aLock,ReadWriteLockor some other synchronizer that is not reentrant. Reentrant means that a thread that already holds a lock can retake it. Java's synchronized blocks are reentrant. Therefore the following code will work without problems:

public class Reentrant{

  public synchronized outer(){
    inner();
  }

  public synchronized inner(){
    //do something
  }
}

Notice how bothouter()andinner()are declared synchronized, which in Java is equivalent to asynchronized(this)block. If a thread callsouter()there is no problem calling inner() from insideouter(), since both methods (or blocks) are synchronized on the same monitor object ("this"). If a thread already holds the lock on a monitor object, it has access to all blocks synchronized on the same monitor object. This is called reentrance. The thread can reenter any block of code for which it already holds the lock.

The followingLockimplementation is not reentrant:

public class Lock{

  private boolean isLocked = false;

  public synchronized void lock()
  throws InterruptedException{
    while(isLocked){
      wait();
    }
    isLocked = true;
  }

  public synchronized void unlock(){
    isLocked = false;
    notify();
  }
}

If a thread callslock()twice without callingunlock()in between, the second call tolock()will block. A reentrance lockout has occurred.

To avoid reentrance lockouts you have two options:

1. Avoid writing code that reenters locks
2. Use reentrant locks

Which of these options suit your project best depends on your concrete situation. Reentrant locks often don't perform as well as non-reentrant locks, and they are harder to implement, but this may not necessary be a problem in your case. Whether or not your code is easier to implement with or without lock reentrance must be determined case by case.